Forum    Members    Search    FAQ

Board index » Erfworld Things » Reactions




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ] 
 
Author Message
 Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 3:48 am 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 467
Poor Wrigley, so his story ends. At least he was happy and could insert his spear into a woman once.

_________________
I love uncroaked Dora. I love an anonymous friend even more.

Only one man has understood me, and even he has not!

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 3:55 am 
    E is for Erfworld Supporter This user was a Tool before it was cool Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:15 pm
    Posts: 1446
    Wakky wrote:
    It seems to me that the Uncwoaked troops are handling being leaderless better than normal troops. They have a natural fanaticism, a fearless nature. Does this mean that Tramenis will have a harder time rolling over them than he thinks? It could be kind of a nasty surprise. :shock:


    No, decrypted troops seem to be handling being leaderless about the same way that normal troops would.

    Remember what we've always heard - unled troops automatically engage in combat. That's exactly what happened. As long as there were commanders around, the troops could be kept around in reserve. Once all the warlords croaked, unled stacks automatically attacked. That's not specific to uncroaked or decrypted.

    _________________
    For those in the USA: Have you wondered what you would do during in the civil rights movement, or in the 1930s?

    Well, what did you do yesterday? Now you know.

    Let's all be the kind of people we wish everyone had been then. Show up. Call. Resist.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 3:56 am 
    This user is a Tool! Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit Erfworld Bicycle® Playing Cards supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 3:52 am
    Posts: 239
    TheCat wrote:
    One wonders if the enemy leader that Wrigley speared was named Mint.

    Nah. The joke, as before, is that Wrigley has never used his spear. Therefore, Wrigley's spear is mint.

    _________________
    Image

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 4:26 am 
    User avatar
    Year of the Dwagon Supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 5:24 am
    Posts: 3447
    Wow.

    For a moment there I almost thought Wrigley had done Tremmennis in. Now THAT would've been a shocker.

    Tensor wrote:
    Wrigley rules!

    Rob, you just found your diamond character, the one nobody expected to mean much, but everyone loves.


    Yeah, and it's amazing how regular this pattern is (Sammy, Wrigley, You Know Who ...)*. Is this just a usual "rooting for the underdog" bias or does it speak more about this specific audience? Liking characters that are mere pawns caught adrift amidst irresistible and often incomprehensible historical flows ... do they remind us of anyone?

    Then they are quite reliably killed off. Makes for good story economy.

    And, amazingly, drama.

    *: one exception- Slately. Some people like 'im but that's not the usual reaction. I suppose that by being a king, Slately can't claim with conviction to be a mere pawn of history.

    _________________
    The whole point of this is lost if you keep it a secret.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 4:39 am 
    User avatar
    Year of the Dwagon Supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:16 am
    Posts: 153
    Location: Scotland, UK (The other other Magic Kingdom)
    Lady Nerevar wrote:
    d'aaw, makes me all warm and fuzzy, in a morbid sort of way.


    My sentiments exactly :)


    It's nice to see yet another example of how Rob's writing takes you to various different places ; some moments really funny and silly, some moments epic and explosive, some moments dark and sorrowful... Some moments just "wtf?" And then moments like this where it's seemingly mutually explusive concepts of sad and happy at the same time..... All these moments seem very nicely fused and flow really well. Respect to ya Mr Erfworld Man *tips hat*

    _________________
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    ...I'm still holding out for the Arkenoid...
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 4:39 am 
    Offline
    Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:37 pm
    Posts: 178
    BLANDCorporatio wrote:
    Yeah, and it's amazing how regular this pattern is (Sammy, Wrigley, You Know Who ...)*. Is this just a usual "rooting for the underdog" bias or does it speak more about this specific audience? Liking characters that are mere pawns caught adrift amidst irresistible and often incomprehensible historical flows ... do they remind us of anyone?

    Then they are quite reliably killed off. Makes for good story economy.


    Actualy, I believe it's one of the main points of the story. This is war and people die even tough everything is cuty-fuzzy.

    And those people dying aren't just faceless mooks. They each have their own dreams and mind and ambition. But that doesn't stop the cruel erfworld from taking them.

    It's not about introducing interesting characters and them discarding them. It's about showing that people are dying in the middle of all this conflict, not just mindless game miniatures.

    Unless your name is Jillian of course, in wich case you can do pretty much everything you want and you won't die no matter how foolish it is.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 5:10 am 
    User avatar
    Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:47 am
    Posts: 1126
    WLM: zilfallon@hotmail.com
    Location: Magic Kingdom
    Quote:
    Unless your name is Jillian of course, in wich case you can do pretty much everything you want and you won't die no matter how foolish it is.


    I totally agree with that :D

    _________________
    JadedDragoon wrote:
    I was hoping we could debate the meaning of "agent" in the the Declaration of Non-Aggression again. It totally hasn't been argued to death already.

    You know... at this point you boops aren't beating dead horses any more. You're making glue.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 5:27 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:41 pm
    Posts: 526
    Yahoo Messenger: grixit
    Location: santa maria, ca
    TheCat wrote:
    One wonders if the enemy leader that Wrigley speared was named Mint.


    Heh.

    _________________
    Read, like there won't be a movie
    Game, like the die rolls don't matter
    Filk, like everyone is tone deaf anyway

    10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
    . . . . . . Dr Pepper
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .4

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 5:54 am 
    Offline
    Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:47 pm
    Posts: 29
    Spot wrote:
    Wrigley came back, and he was no less free in his second life as an Uncroaked, than he was in his first life as a regular unit.


    Yes, I thought exactly the same thing. He still has the same goals and single-mindedness.

    EDIT: Oh, and great art with all the chaos-filled battle.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 6:07 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 3:49 am
    Posts: 432
    Location: Sydney
    Alas, Wrigley, the Titans have taken you again far to soon. Every named character shall have a resolution of some sort, for the writers are truly great. Excellent update. It does seem a fitting close for Wrigley, and it was nice seeing into his head again, although it was "the more things change the more they stay the same" for him (other then being happier this time).

    I wonder if he got the nameless, 1st lv Jetstone Warlord. I couldn't tell for sure if it was implying he used his spear to kill her or just kill someone, anyone (just have to use that spear once). It looks he succeeded either way.

    I do wonder who that good 1st lv warlord was. Perhaps she was the one we saw mourning the loss of Oss. I'm going to assume so. Now that just leaves the fate of I. Brows (my personal Scarlet of book two) - until it is shown otherwise I'm going to believe it was he who chopped off Ford's leg.

    Nice to see some more detail on the battle -Ford tried to rush at Trem but got taken out by another Jetstone stack. Sounds like the whole battle went pretty much Jetstone's way from the word go and they few men and women, a good result.

    (name here) wrote:
    Well, that's an interesting insight into unlead stacks. Also, looks like ford took an enemy warlord with him after all.


    I don't know, that seems like something Wrigley would mention/think on - more important and inspiring then the fact he stabbed and failed to kill the LFN that squashed him, since it would be the one success to come out of Ford's action (charge stopped before getting anywhere near the target, getting his leg cut off and then getting dusted).

    krko wrote:
    Trammenis is very much a warlord and has no cape. Duncan too.


    I don't think they count as normal warlords - chief warlords/princes/princesses tend to have very individualistic looks, while the rest of the Jetstone warlords we have seen have a very similar uniforme. Which isn't to say I disagree - though as I say above I'm not fully sure what the result was. I'm assuming after this battle we'll see Trem getting a report on the losses.

    badninja wrote:
    So we see a lowly stabber kill a level 1 warlord. We knew this battle was going to be over fast and it was interesting to see that the forces that where left at the bridge knew that after loosing all their leadership. Nice to see the battle wrap up here but how well everyone react to the return of Parson, the man who brought down Ansom? I feel that everyone but Charlie is going to take this decision worth a grain of salt until it is to late.


    They might not even know the significance, unless Parson makes a habit of telling them. We don't know if Ansom communicated with his father and brothers that GK had a strange CW by the name of Parson.

    oslecamo2 wrote:
    And those people dying aren't just faceless mooks. They each have their own dreams and mind and ambition. But that doesn't stop the cruel erfworld from taking them.

    It's not about introducing interesting characters and them discarding them. It's about showing that people are dying in the middle of all this conflict, not just mindless game miniatures.


    Well said.

    _________________
    And so my time with the Tardy Elves draws to a close, and I am let to ponder how the experience will... eh, I'll finish later. No need to rush.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 6:43 am 
    This user is a Tool! Erfworld Bicycle® Playing Cards supporter Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:53 am
    Posts: 439
    I was hoping Wrigley would survive to some future battle, and eventually confront the Dittomancer, only to fall to an elaborate Doublemint spell.

    At least he died happy.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 8:59 am 
    Offline
    Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:38 pm
    Posts: 210
    I suspected Wrigley would be showing up some time or another in the arc. Nice to know he got to use his spear this time around, but it's still sad to the little stabber go. The vib I am getting from this text update is the Wanda is not the one putting the fanatical loyalty in their Decypted minds. I reall think the Arkenpliers is doing it on it's own.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 9:04 am 
    Offline
    Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:59 am
    Posts: 199
    Tensor wrote:
    Wrigley rules!

    Rob, you just found your diamond character, the one nobody expected to mean much, but everyone loves.


    Kind'a like the Barneys (the Black Mesa security guards) from the original Half-Life.

    They were meant to be disposable - somewhat capable fighters, but mainly sponges for enemy fire.

    Valve/Sierra never expected the players to get attached to the Barneys, but a lot of them did . . .

    _________________
    The strength of our future lies in our past.
    -VNV Nation

    There is no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare.
    -Sun-tzu, The Art of War

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 9:08 am 
    Offline
    Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:37 pm
    Posts: 178
    Dancing Cthulhu wrote:
    krko wrote:
    Trammenis is very much a warlord and has no cape. Duncan too.


    I don't think they count as normal warlords - chief warlords/princes/princesses tend to have very individualistic looks, while the rest of the Jetstone warlords we have seen have a very similar uniforme. Which isn't to say I disagree - though as I say above I'm not fully sure what the result was. I'm assuming after this battle we'll see Trem getting a report on the losses.


    In book 1 Webinar and her girlfriend don't have capes either. I support the theory that capes=high level warlords/units. Ossomer for example had a cape, as well as Ansom, both being the strongest princes of Jetstone, while Tramenis the diplomat probably sees little frontline action and thus must be just medium level.

    Also there's the smile of the stabber. That's not the smile of just killing a random enemy mook. That's the smile of someone who managed to kill a much more valuable unit than himself. For a basic soldier in Erfworld, killing an enemy leader must indeed feel like the Titans are smiling upon you, even if you're doomed to get croacked next.

    Kinda reminds me of Bogroll, wich seemed specialy enthusiastic when he performs the suicide attack on Ansom. He knew he wouldn't make out of it alive, but being able to take down the biggest unit of the enemy felt like a great honor to him.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 9:38 am 
    Offline
    Joined: Thu May 20, 2010 9:27 am
    Posts: 1
    I've been following Erfworld since page 1, book 1. Yet, it was this text upade that made me sing in just to say: that was beautiful.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 11:11 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:44 pm
    Posts: 1185
    Wonderful. What a perfect grace note of a vignette.

    HandofShadows wrote:
    The vib I am getting from this text update is the Wanda is not the one putting the fanatical loyalty in their Decypted minds. I reall think the Arkenpliers is doing it on it's own.


    It's been shown that the fanaticism of the Decrypted can be an inconvenience even to Wanda. If she were crafting their new mindset, wouldn't she just the Titans with herself in their pantheon?

    _________________
    They could not possibly win. Every man knew this with certainty, and lo it was glorious.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 11:53 am 
    User avatar
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Battle Crest Pins Supporter Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter This user is a Tool! Year of the Dwagon Supporter This user was a Tool before it was cool Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit This user has been published! Erfworld Bicycle® Playing Cards supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:04 pm
    Posts: 103
    Location: Colorado
    Graet Update and Im glad Wrigley got to stab something.

    _________________
    Check out my fanfic THe Life and Adventures of Edelbert Spore I would love to hear what you think!

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 12:35 pm 
    This user is a Tool! Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit Erfworld Bicycle® Playing Cards supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:26 pm
    Posts: 117
    And that's what Wrigley's spear meant, by gum...

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 1:23 pm 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:07 pm
    Posts: 25
    After reading Wrigley's account, though cloaked in bhakti "for the titans", from my perspective Rob is really fucking Zen or channeling such.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 1:35 pm 
    User avatar
    This user got funny with a rodent Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 3:06 am
    Posts: 46
    Fantabulastic wrote:
    Pretty sure we've seen Wrigley before in the summer updates. Too bad he didn't do better for himself. C'est la vie.


    I fixed it for you (personal pet peeve).

    Dancing Cthulhu wrote:
    (name here) wrote:
    Well, that's an interesting insight into unlead stacks. Also, looks like ford took an enemy warlord with him after all.


    I don't know, that seems like something Wrigley would mention/think on - more important and inspiring then the fact he stabbed and failed to kill the LFN that squashed him, since it would be the one success to come out of Ford's action (charge stopped before getting anywhere near the target, getting his leg cut off and then getting dusted).


    No no, he meant, assuming Wrigley managed to kill a warlord, that Ford's plan resulted in a warlord's death.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
    Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     
    Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 79 posts ] 

    Board index » Erfworld Things » Reactions


    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 17 guests

     
     

     
    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot post attachments in this forum

    Search for:
    Jump to: