Forum    Members    Search    FAQ

Board index » Erfworld Things » Reactions




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 134 posts ] 
 
Author Message
 Post Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 7:10 pm 
User avatar
Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
Offline
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 1:45 pm
Posts: 16
Website: http://www.willkinchlea.com/blog
Location: Toronto, ON
As one who stumbled upon Erf in the first update and was hooked from the first marbit, this was effing amazing. And I for one, love the strong text.

I can't wait for the Summer Klogs; I imagine we'll see some epic changes that will have to be flashbacked during the second book.

Also - just because it says that there is four known arkentools - doesn't mean there isn't more. I have a feeling there may be many more.

_________________
+End Transmission+

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 7:59 pm 
    Offline
    Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 7:43 pm
    Posts: 9
    Can't say anything that Kin didn't put in his post.
    Been a fan since the very first update and have been checking back on a daily basis in hope of updates and being extremely happy when there have been. Amazing comic. Love it ^^

    Also I like how now Parson is breaking the rules with a huge swear word, nice way to let the world know you mean business! =D

    Come onnnnnnn book 2! <3

    _________________
    |Druid|Paladin|SteamID|Twitter|
    Image

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:35 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 4:17 am
    Posts: 666
    WLM: mooseodeath@hotmail.com
    Location: Brisbane, Australia
    come on thursday's update. this waiting malarki is for chumps.

    _________________
    http://moosetech.blogspot.com/ my video game art. in easy to read blog form. swing on by. laugh at my spelling.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 9:23 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 9:14 am
    Posts: 7
    gameboy1234 wrote:
    Ghanur wrote:
    Great ending!

    Something vaguely similar: "I am not a number! I am a free man!"


    Heh. Is your avatar from "The Prisoner?"

    Yes ;)

    _________________
    I am not a number!

    Avatar from - The Prisoner

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:37 pm 
    Offline
    Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:17 pm
    Posts: 155
    Great way to end the book.

    Now I've been thinking about this last 2 pages maybe longer than I should have, trying to make sense to things. Mainly why he was able to drop that F-bomb.

    The way I think it goes, the change comes from page 134, when he realizes that the game can't be won within the rules and essentially breaks them by uncroaking the volcano. So once he's broken the rules, he´s no longer bound by them, perhaps?

    It'd be interesting to find out what other rule he's no longer bound to. Turns? Move? Loyalty? That would certainly be a twist.

    And that statement he makes, about him being "a player", that would make every other faction NPCs... One single player in a world on NPCs. Wow.

    _________________
    Gentlemen, I like war.
    I like trench war, I like Blitzkrieg, I like the offensive, I like the defensive.
    I truly love each and every kind of war man can wage on a tabletop game.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:33 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Fri May 29, 2009 12:28 am
    Posts: 26
    I, for one, thought that that was a very powerful ending. Can't wait for book two :)

    _________________
    Beware the Borg Tribbles!!

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:55 pm 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 11:36 pm
    Posts: 986
    Yahoo Messenger: tick_72000@yahoo.com
    I wonder about what effect Parson's sword dissolving will have?

    _________________
    I would be a procrastinator, but I keep putting it off.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 9:03 pm 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 4:17 am
    Posts: 666
    WLM: mooseodeath@hotmail.com
    Location: Brisbane, Australia
    adding a slightly higher level of ferrous and carbon to the lava lake mostly. possibly silver.

    though as a stupid meal prize, it may have been plastic, at which case it could have released toxic fumes in minute quantities to the atmosphere.

    _________________
    http://moosetech.blogspot.com/ my video game art. in easy to read blog form. swing on by. laugh at my spelling.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 3:40 pm 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:44 pm
    Posts: 1185
    the_tick_rules wrote:
    I wonder about what effect Parson's sword dissolving will have?

    I assume that you're referring to the ruthlessness "bonus?"

    _________________
    They could not possibly win. Every man knew this with certainty, and lo it was glorious.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 7:49 pm 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 10:07 pm
    Posts: 66
    DevilDan wrote:
    I assume that you're referring to the ruthlessness "bonus?"

    Surely, all 3 things the sword granted him: combat, leadership, and ruthlessness.

    Presumably he would have been able to fight with the sword. Not sure how; maybe it would have acted like a dancing sword, or dragged him around like a puppet. Now, he's once again no more than a nerd who can't climb stairs without exhausting himself. Stay away from the front lines, young man.

    He's going to suffer for losing the leadership bonus. We don't know how big it was, but we do know that Stanley was annoyed that Parson himself only had a +2 leadership bonus. For him to have had more, and then thrown it in the lake of fire… Stanley's not going to like that.

    And ruthlessness? That's the one he didn't want, but next time he's in a difficult battle with his back to the wall, what's he going to do? Love his enemies to death, like the Hippiemancer he's speculated to be?

    _________________
    Grammar: It's not the law, it's just a good idea.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:57 pm 
    User avatar
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Battle Crest Pins Supporter Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter This user is a Tool! This user was a Tool before it was cool Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter Erfworld Bicycle® Playing Cards supporter Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 3:12 pm
    Posts: 224
    Arkenputtyknife wrote:
    Love his enemies to death, like the Hippiemancer he's speculated to be?


    If Big Al can hug Jillian to death, so can Parson.

    _________________
    I am the Barbarian Gamer. I can roam. I can explore. I am free to make purchases or returns or forum posts of whatever I please. I'm here for the same reasons you are. One, this interests me. And two? I love Erfworld. May the Titans help me.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:19 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 4:17 am
    Posts: 666
    WLM: mooseodeath@hotmail.com
    Location: Brisbane, Australia
    Arkenputtyknife wrote:
    DevilDan wrote:
    I assume that you're referring to the ruthlessness "bonus?"

    Surely, all 3 things the sword granted him: combat, leadership, and ruthlessness.

    Presumably he would have been able to fight with the sword. Not sure how; maybe it would have acted like a dancing sword, or dragged him around like a puppet. Now, he's once again no more than a nerd who can't climb stairs without exhausting himself. Stay away from the front lines, young man.

    He's going to suffer for losing the leadership bonus. We don't know how big it was, but we do know that Stanley was annoyed that Parson himself only had a +2 leadership bonus. For him to have had more, and then thrown it in the lake of fire… Stanley's not going to like that.

    And ruthlessness? That's the one he didn't want, but next time he's in a difficult battle with his back to the wall, what's he going to do? Love his enemies to death, like the Hippiemancer he's speculated to be?

    the sword didn't make parson more ruthless. it just removed his inhibitions about using it. like maggies says later. it was already there. bogroll could only pull off the foolamancy trap for ansom because superficially parson and bogroll were similar in shape. likewise the sword could only allow parson to use the traits he had but wasn't using. he needed that sword to push him to do what needed doing before he was ready.

    _________________
    http://moosetech.blogspot.com/ my video game art. in easy to read blog form. swing on by. laugh at my spelling.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:57 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 10:07 pm
    Posts: 66
    moose o death wrote:
    the sword didn't make parson more ruthless. it just removed his inhibitions about using it.

    Which amounts to the same thing; the end result is identical. The questions would be whether the inhibitions returned when the sword was discarded, and what it would take for Parson to overcome them again.

    _________________
    Grammar: It's not the law, it's just a good idea.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:10 pm 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:44 pm
    Posts: 1185
    Arkenputtyknife wrote:
    moose o death wrote:
    the sword didn't make parson more ruthless. it just removed his inhibitions about using it.

    Which amounts to the same thing; the end result is identical. The questions would be whether the inhibitions returned when the sword was discarded, and what it would take for Parson to overcome them again.

    The threat of disembowelment can be a superb allicient.

    _________________
    They could not possibly win. Every man knew this with certainty, and lo it was glorious.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:36 pm 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 4:17 am
    Posts: 666
    WLM: mooseodeath@hotmail.com
    Location: Brisbane, Australia
    Arkenputtyknife wrote:
    moose o death wrote:
    the sword didn't make parson more ruthless. it just removed his inhibitions about using it.

    Which amounts to the same thing; the end result is identical. The questions would be whether the inhibitions returned when the sword was discarded, and what it would take for Parson to overcome them again.

    it's not the same. the sword added nothing more to parson's personality, it simply gave him confidence. destroying the sword did not rob him of anything. he had already lost his confidence upon seeing the destruction he had caused. the sword was already useless for it's intended purpose.

    for parson to come full circle and allow him to be a chief warlord again, the lives of sizemore, maggie, possibly stanley/wanda need to be threatened. people parson has respect for and even a bond of friendship. losing one or more of them through inaction will resolve his feelings towards erfworld's forever wars. then he'll break that world.

    _________________
    http://moosetech.blogspot.com/ my video game art. in easy to read blog form. swing on by. laugh at my spelling.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:28 pm 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 10:07 pm
    Posts: 66
    moose o death wrote:
    it's not the same. the sword added nothing more to parson's personality, it simply gave him confidence.

    So which is it? Did it give him nothing, as you say, or did it give him confidence, as you say? Start making sense.

    _________________
    Grammar: It's not the law, it's just a good idea.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:46 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 4:17 am
    Posts: 666
    WLM: mooseodeath@hotmail.com
    Location: Brisbane, Australia
    it didn't have a physical affect, it was a placebo.

    _________________
    http://moosetech.blogspot.com/ my video game art. in easy to read blog form. swing on by. laugh at my spelling.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:15 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:44 pm
    Posts: 1185
    Obecalp for everyone!

    _________________
    They could not possibly win. Every man knew this with certainty, and lo it was glorious.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:06 pm 
    User avatar
    This user is a Tool! This user was a Tool before it was cool Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit This user has been published! Erfworld Bicycle® Playing Cards supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 2:40 pm
    Posts: 832
    Location: The Divided States of America
    As I reread the comic, I notice for the first time that there is some kind of energy leaving the Sword of Ruthlessness... what if it spawns in a ruin somewhere? (It also appears that Stanley found the Hammer in ruins, so do artifacts/Tools get lost and respawn?).

    _________________
    A couple things:
    A: It is Shockmancy, not ShockAmancy.
    B: Faq as a side is not an acronym.
    C: Starting a theory from the point of view that characters have given false information (knowingly or unknowingly) is not a valid way to build an argument.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 1:06 pm 
    User avatar
    This user is a Tool! This user was a Tool before it was cool Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit Erfworld Bicycle® Playing Cards supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 8:30 pm
    Posts: 420
    CarniDollMancer wrote:
    It also appears that Stanley found the Hammer in ruins...

    Why does everyone keep saying that? Where in the comic does it say that Stanley found the 'Hammer in ruins?

    I'm not saying he didn't, but it seems just as likely that he pried it from the warm dead hands of some other warlord.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
    Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     
    Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 134 posts ] 

    Board index » Erfworld Things » Reactions


    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: Anomynous 167, Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], Eevi, lecrone, MasterAaron and 12 guests

     
     

     
    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot post attachments in this forum

    Search for:
    Jump to: