Forum    Members    Search    FAQ

Board index » Erfworld Things » Reactions




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 102 posts ] 
 
Author Message
 Post Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:39 am 
Here for the 10th Anniversary
Offline
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 5:55 pm
Posts: 1466
Oberon wrote:
Because alliances can be broken, and that's as close a thing to a contract that we know much of anything about.
We know about Charlie's deal with Parson that somehow guarantees that Parson will be honest when reporting the results of his calculations. Charlie actually knows that Parson is telling the truth, even when the numbers seem highly unlikely. See Book 1, Page 105.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2013 7:07 am 
    This user is a Tool! Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 6:04 am
    Posts: 470
    Could be that while sides can break contracts, units can not.

    Though if that was the case, then it is stronger tehn duty, and should replace duty. Have every unit pinky-swear their loyalty and they are unable to rebel.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2013 7:28 pm 
    Offline
    Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:59 am
    Posts: 1191
    Lilwik wrote:
    Oberon wrote:
    Because alliances can be broken, and that's as close a thing to a contract that we know much of anything about.
    We know about Charlie's deal with Parson that somehow guarantees that Parson will be honest when reporting the results of his calculations. Charlie actually knows that Parson is telling the truth, even when the numbers seem highly unlikely. See Book 1, Page 105.
    And although the RCCII alliance included both Jetstone and Haggar, Slately was convinced that the force Haggar was sending to Jetstone (the city) was purposefully delaying to allow Jetstone to be weakened in conflict with GK, only to arrive just in time to turn on Jetstone and attack. In other words, to break their alliance, and with no penalty mentioned at all.

    I'm not sure if you had a point you were trying to make, unless you were simply offering up one piece of the scant evidence we have on how contracts and alliances work. If so, I just offered up another.

    Contracts may be harder to break than alliances (or even impossible), if only because, as in the contract Charlie has with Parson, one side may deliver well in advance of the other side, and allowing that to be broken before the second side delivers would be unbalancing. Alliances are typically for mutual benefit, with both sides delivering at least semi-equally with every passing turn. But we have seen alliances with turn limits, between Goodminton and Haffaton. And I'm pretty sure we've seen an alliance, or at least a proposed alliance, with a penalty clause.

    _________________
    How using capslock wins arguments:
    Zeroberon wrote:
    So we know with 100% certainty that THIS IS HOW TRI-LINKS WORK, PERIOD END OF STORY.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2013 7:48 pm 
    Here for the 10th Anniversary
    Offline
    Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 5:55 pm
    Posts: 1466
    Oberon wrote:
    I'm not sure if you had a point you were trying to make, unless you were simply offering up one piece of the scant evidence we have on how contracts and alliances work.
    No, it has nothing to do with how alliances work, only contracts. Parson's agreement with Charlie is a contract. An alliance is when two sides share the same turn by mutual consent. I'm sure that you can have a contract and an alliance if they don't trust each other enough to be allies without some sort of binding agreement, but let's not get the two things confused.

    As for the point I was making, I was just correcting someone who said that we don't know anything about contracts. It's important that we not spread misinformation about those sorts of details, especially when it looks like it will be very important in some future episode of Book 0.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2013 9:15 pm 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:59 pm
    Posts: 1075
    Location: K-W, Ontario, Canada
    Sorry, Lilwik, but Oberon is correct. We know they exist, they give the appearance of being backed by magic, but we really do not know anything about Contracts... at least anything we need to know to draw any conclusions about anything.

    We don't know if Contracts can be dissolved by Breach, as they can in Earthworld.
    We don't know if all Contracts must have Penalty Clauses.
    we don't know if Contracts have default penalty clauses.
    We don't know if there are limits to penalty clauses.
    We don't know if some Contracts can never be willingly breached because of magical compulsion.
    We don't know if unintentional Breach triggers Penalty Clauses.
    We don't know if they must be fair to both Sides.
    We don't know if Vows/Oaths are Contracts.
    We don't know if Casters can overcome contracts, completely or temporarily.
    We don't know if there is any appeal mechanism to get out of contracts that become untenable, or if the contract was agreed to by coercion.
    We don't know if a lack of Intent can prevent the Contract magic from successfully sticking.

    We know Contracts exist. They appear to prevent breach magically. They can include clauses to prevent revelation of the existence of the contract. They can include Penalty Clauses for Breach. But that's not enough to know anything about the nature of Jack and Wanda's contract, whether they must get something in return, whether they could have breached it at any point with some kind of standard penalty had Charlie not stipulated one, or any of the relevant info I mention which can change our interpretation of events. Hopefully some of this comes out in the Book 0 pages to come, where Jack and Wanda should take on the Contract. Perhaps Jillian and Marie, too.

    A contract in Earthworld would not prevent Wanda and jack from revealing their knowledge: it would only apply a Penalty at 4x normal damages, duie to Breach being intentional and not accidental. Wanda and Jack must receive reasonably equal compensation for whatever they agreed to. If you can prove coercion forced you into a contract, it becomes invalid. Standard contracts that include non-standard fine print are not enforceable unless the side that authored the fine print describes it before agreement. And there are a bunch of other contract law stipulations that may or may not have parallels. We can speculate that Contracts in erfworld are like those with the devil in which all terms are enforced literally, unfairness is irrelevant, coercion is irrelevant, and breach impossible. But we don't know for certain. Until we do, we're spitting in the wind.

    _________________
    http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/TBFGK_1 Here you can find all comic pages written as text for convenient quoting.

    http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/Erfworld_Mechanics The starting page for accessing all known Erfworld "rules".

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Sun Aug 25, 2013 11:57 pm 
    Here for the 10th Anniversary
    Offline
    Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 5:55 pm
    Posts: 1466
    Kreistor wrote:
    We don't know if Contracts can be dissolved by Breach, as they can in Earthworld.
    We know some of them can't. Parson is magically bound to deliver his end of the deal. See Book 1, Page 103.
    Kreistor wrote:
    We don't know if all Contracts must have Penalty Clauses.
    It makes no sense to have a penalty clause on a contract that can't be breached.
    Kreistor wrote:
    We don't know if there are limits to penalty clauses.
    True, but why would there be? It would be very strange for Erfworld itself to prohibit you from making a deal where the escape clause involves payment of over a certain arbitrary amount of shmuckers, even if you have the shmuckers to pay.
    Kreistor wrote:
    We don't know if unintentional Breach triggers Penalty Clauses.
    There wouldn't be much point to a penalty clause otherwise. Since contracts can be magically binding, I expect it is impossible to breach a contract without paying the penalty clause first, but that's just a guess.
    Kreistor wrote:
    We don't know if they must be fair to both Sides.
    Surely Charlie has demonstrated that they don't need to be fair somewhere. On the other hand, since both parties need to agree to the contract, they can't be very unfair.
    Kreistor wrote:
    We don't know if Vows/Oaths are Contracts.
    That's true, as far as I'm aware. I'm also curious about the significance of pinkie swears.
    Kreistor wrote:
    We don't know if Casters can overcome contracts, completely or temporarily.
    It doesn't seem likely. That Magic Kingdom's supply of shmuckers seems to depend on making contracts with the outside world, and if casters could ignore a contract even theoretically that would probably be a huge problem.
    Kreistor wrote:
    We don't know if there is any appeal mechanism to get out of contracts that become untenable, or if the contract was agreed to by coercion.
    Since contracts are magically binding, Erfworlders don't need courts to handle disputes. I also suspect that Erfworld has no sympathy for people who are militarily overpowered, even if they are forced to sign contracts that they would normally not sign. They're lucky just to avoid croaking. I expect this will be demonstrated in Book 0 before long.
    Kreistor wrote:
    We don't know if a lack of Intent can prevent the Contract magic from successfully sticking.
    I don't know what you mean by that.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:05 am 
    User avatar
    Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter This user is a Tool! Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary
    Offline
    Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:36 pm
    Posts: 1909
    We don't know if it takes a caster - to even FORM a contract. It might not be natural magic.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 1:50 pm 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:59 pm
    Posts: 1075
    Location: K-W, Ontario, Canada
    Significant Earthworld Contract Law could be Natural Magic in Erfworld. We don't have enough information to know if any of it is, nor if the Deal with the Devil interpretation of technical language is the only Natural Magic in the system. Most of your citations are "failure to mention", not positive evidence by speaking of non-existence. It's not conclusive, and Contract Magic can yet be defined to match Earthworld Contract Law without requiring any changes to the conversation you cite.

    The progression and confusions around what was permissible off-Turn demonstrates how in this comic, you can't read much into the "failure to mention."

    For instance, Parson may not mention that he can Breach to Wanda, but that may be because Wanda already knows he can, and what the penalty may be. In Earthworld, intentional Breach is 4x damages, which would be 4x the value of the remaining Calculations. He wouldn't need to mention that in his conversation, if it's standard. So that can still go either way. Why would Parson Breach? If the calculation threatened his Overlord to the point it triggers Duty disbanding by answering. That leads to the realization that we have competing (Natural?) Magics with potentially devastating outcomes, even annihilation. If Contract Magic does not inherently prevent such conflicts, then the Contracts themselves must be written to prevent it, or anyone signing a Contract risks it turning into suicide.

    _________________
    http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/TBFGK_1 Here you can find all comic pages written as text for convenient quoting.

    http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/Erfworld_Mechanics The starting page for accessing all known Erfworld "rules".

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 4:50 pm 
    Here for the 10th Anniversary
    Offline
    Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 5:55 pm
    Posts: 1466
    Kreistor wrote:
    For instance, Parson may not mention that he can Breach to Wanda, but that may be because Wanda already knows he can, and what the penalty may be.
    That's not failure to mention; that's a different interpretation of Parson's words. So you think that when Parson says, "I'm magically bound to give him twelve battle evaluations," it's actually still an optional thing and that the magical part of it isn't that he's being forced to do anything, but rather that a magical punishment will come down on him if he doesn't do it. I admit that it's technically possible that he might have meant that, but I consider it low probability because I don't think he would say it that way. He wouldn't call that magical, because there'd be nothing magical about him having to do the battle evaluations, at least as long as he doesn't break the deal. He would just have said, "I have to give him twelve battle evaluations," or he might have said, "I have to give him twelve battle evaluations or I turn into a frog."

    I really think we should take "magically bound" to mean what it sounds like until there is any evidence to the contrary.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 5:10 pm 
    Battle Crest Pins Supporter This user is a Tool! Year of the Dwagon Supporter This user was a Tool before it was cool Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter E is for Erfworld Supporter IRC Quote of the Moment Here for the 10th Anniversary
    Offline
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:22 pm
    Posts: 187
    Kreistor wrote:
    Significant Earthworld Contract Law could be Natural Magic in Erfworld. We don't have enough information to know if any of it is, nor if the Deal with the Devil interpretation of technical language is the only Natural Magic in the system. Most of your citations are "failure to mention", not positive evidence by speaking of non-existence. It's not conclusive, and Contract Magic can yet be defined to match Earthworld Contract Law without requiring any changes to the conversation you cite.

    The progression and confusions around what was permissible off-Turn demonstrates how in this comic, you can't read much into the "failure to mention."

    For instance, Parson may not mention that he can Breach to Wanda, but that may be because Wanda already knows he can, and what the penalty may be. In Earthworld, intentional Breach is 4x damages, which would be 4x the value of the remaining Calculations. He wouldn't need to mention that in his conversation, if it's standard. So that can still go either way. Why would Parson Breach? If the calculation threatened his Overlord to the point it triggers Duty disbanding by answering. That leads to the realization that we have competing (Natural?) Magics with potentially devastating outcomes, even annihilation. If Contract Magic does not inherently prevent such conflicts, then the Contracts themselves must be written to prevent it, or anyone signing a Contract risks it turning into suicide.


    Just to let you know, Kreistor isn't going to be here for the next month; he's currently on a temporary vacation, if you catch my drift.

    _________________
    If I am acting as a mod, you will know it.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 5:37 pm 
    This user was a Tool before it was cool This user is a Tool! Here for the 10th Anniversary
    Offline
    Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 10:11 pm
    Posts: 923
    Maybe they are called the Great Minds that Think Alike because they have their meetings and polls either via thinkagram or in their temple, and only present a unified front to outsiders. If the judge thinkamancer is the only one at the end of the discussion that is vehemently against progressing forward, and the rest of tGMtTA have been persuaded to either vote neutral of for.... Maybe the judge just stays silent on the issue and lets the "Yea"'s have their day.

    They don't have to be a hive mind and think the exact same thing, but they support group decisions regardless of personal views on the subject.

    Much shorter title than "the Great Minds that Discuss Issues Ad Nauseum and After Careful Debate Agree to Agree with the Majority or Plurality Vote Regardless of Individual Speculation or Pet Theories".

    On a side note, it'd be nice to see other factions within MK in a similar update, giving names to casters we have only seen before, and going more in depth into their discipline. It was very interesting to see that thinkamancy can be set up as a poll and bounced around to different thinkamancers.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 6:00 pm 
    Offline
    Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:49 pm
    Posts: 127
    Justyn wrote:

    Just to let you know, Kreistor isn't going to be here for the next month; he's currently on a temporary vacation, if you catch my drift.


    So he really did win a free vacation to Hawaii from McDonald's? Lucky boop.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:11 am 
    User avatar
    This user is a Tool! This user was a Tool before it was cool This user is a member of Team Erfworld IRC Quote of the Moment This user got funny with a rodent This user has been published! Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:30 pm
    Posts: 356
    It's actually 90 days. It was a difficult action to take, but I think a clear one. We haven't had to action anyone on this forum in a year or so, but when all the discussions start to revolve around one user, it's time to talk with that user.

    And I didn't like how our talk went.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 3:30 pm 
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Battle Crest Pins Supporter Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter This user is a Tool! Year of the Dwagon Supporter This user was a Tool before it was cool Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit Erfworld Bicycle® Playing Cards supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 12:02 pm
    Posts: 46
    balder wrote:
    It's actually 90 days. It was a difficult action to take, but I think a clear one. We haven't had to action anyone on this forum in a year or so, but when all the discussions start to revolve around one user, it's time to talk with that user.

    And I didn't like how our talk went.


    Thank you... at least for this user, what was revolving around that user was my dropping in to read and giving up when I encountered him/her... and then not coming back for a while. And just the knowledge that anything I did post might draw Kreistor in acted as a disincentive.

    Not that I'm all that much of a loss as I almost never post, but I'm part of the usually-invisible effect. For the next month I'll be reading and enjoying, so you have my thanks, and I thought you ought to know this kind of thing was out there.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:22 pm 
    User avatar
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Battle Crest Pins Supporter Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit Erfworld Bicycle® Playing Cards supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 11:57 pm
    Posts: 910
    The censor user's posts button being right under peoples avatars would resolve a lot of these issues. :|

    _________________
    “I will tell you precisely what Royalty is,” said Intra, “It is a continuous cutting motion.”

    -The Song of Maybe

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 1:59 am 
    Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:06 am
    Posts: 224
    I feel compelled to say at least one gentle word in the fellas favour. I think he was not malignant. He wasn't trying to be a troll or unkind, he just had an excessive-compulsive edge to his posts. We none of us shine with the light of perfection I guess, I know that I myself don't always notice when the compulsion to contradict overtakes me.

    In making this comment, I am not saying "thing one" about whatever actions the people who provide us with the website as "a meeting place to enjoy the stories ramifications together in" were compelled to take, you are to consider. Thankfully I just get to benefit, not endure any of the difficulties.

    "Tugs fetlock in subservient gratitude"

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 12:09 pm 
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Battle Crest Pins Supporter Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter This user is a Tool! Year of the Dwagon Supporter This user was a Tool before it was cool Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit Erfworld Bicycle® Playing Cards supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 12:02 pm
    Posts: 46
    I feel compelled to agree wholeheartedly with Tonot's first paragraph. And his second. I'm not sure if I have a fetlock, though, so I'll bow out there.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 3:08 pm 
    User avatar
    Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter This user is a Tool! Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary
    Offline
    Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:36 pm
    Posts: 1909
    Unless you're a horse, Tonot, you mean forelock.

    Maybe you're RP-ing as a pony, though? You never can tell, these days.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 3:06 am 
    Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 1:06 am
    Posts: 224
    lol. Good catch there. of course, I meant forelock, Squire. And being accurate, I don't got one of them anymore either. Sunburn only in that spot.

    Furry people know too well to admit to it, don't they?. Just because they saw cartoon characters being offered humanity, don't mean they would lose their learn'd wariness.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 9:41 pm 
    User avatar
    This user was a Tool before it was cool
    Offline
    Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 4:33 pm
    Posts: 362
    Just catching up on these, so this is a bit late.
    But there is a reference (intentional or not) that may have been missed. It's noted that Jintau responds to the poll before anyone else and this is out of character...
    So...

    ...Hu's on first??

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
    Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     
    Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 102 posts ] 

    Board index » Erfworld Things » Reactions


    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: 64bitrobot, Baidu [Spider], Dante, jelena22, Lipkin, Longbird, lunapanshiel, Not Me and 11 guests

     
     

     
    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot post attachments in this forum

    Search for:
    Jump to: