Forum    Members    Search    FAQ

Board index » Erfworld Things » Everything Else Erfworld




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Decrypting friendlies?
 Post Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:48 pm 
Offline
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:31 pm
Posts: 28
When Jack and Parson are talking and preparing for battle simulation, it's mentioned that they pass the decrypted hobgobwin knights without a word.

That got me thinking. If the Hobgobwins are decrypted, are they decrypted because they are returnees from the original siege/catastrophe, or did they pop more recently and get executed? We know that the GK forces are killing and decrypting everyone they concur, seems odd that they'd behave differently towards their own. More to the point, there are substantial benefits to not doing so.

It seems like you'd want to execute and decrypt every unit that popped in GK, on the basis that they become maintenance free, and can get stack bonuses from Wanda. From our view into Ansom's POV it seems like it also increases their Loyalty. From an IC POV it seems like the GK side should decrypt everything, or at least everything Wanda has Move to reach (everything with a Dwagon relay).

I think Parson is genre savvy enough to know that you don't want all your troops to share the same vulnerability to plot screwage, but Wanda/Ansom seem like about the right blend of stupid and smart to institute a mandatory decrypting policy.

And that brings up another point, why not decrypt the casters? We know from Ansom that even powerful units can be decrypted, and retain their usefulness. Shouldn't Wanda get working on Jack, Maggie, etc? It would seem that insuring their loyalty and getting rid of their expensive maintenance would be critical.

Parson himself seems enough of a rules exception that Wanda would be leery of trying it with him. He's too valuable to mess with.

I could easily see a scene in the future with Parson arguing with Wanda in front of Stanley about the fate of GK's non decrypted.

Edit: Looking back at the Mistey's funeral scene, Uncroaked casters only function as infantry. If the same is true of decrypted, then that'll save Jack & Maggie, for sure. Wanda & Stanley may not care to experiment.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:14 pm 
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter Year of the Dwagon Supporter Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter This user is a Tool! Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 7:42 pm
    Posts: 76
    Not seeing it. As it is now, living units are allowed to die once and use Decryption as a get-out-of-death-free card. I see no reason why you would kill a perfectly capable unit just for the upkeep and combat benefit; the capability of being "resurrected" is far better. If you really wanted to be this ruthless (remember, these are people you are talking about), you would at least put these living units at the front line so they could die "legit" first, then Decrypt for extra mileage.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:52 pm 
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 10:38 am
    Posts: 830
    gaiaswill wrote:
    Not seeing it. As it is now, living units are allowed to die once and use Decryption as a get-out-of-death-free card. I see no reason why you would kill a perfectly capable unit just for the upkeep and combat benefit; the capability of being "resurrected" is far better. If you really wanted to be this ruthless (remember, these are people you are talking about), you would at least put these living units at the front line so they could die "legit" first, then Decrypt for extra mileage.


    Right. Assuming the units are loyal, there is no point in killing them. Units are presumably worth their upkeep anyway, otherwise, there would be no point in popping them.

    Also, even if loyalty isn't an issue, Stanley could still be concerned about who the unit is loyal to.

    If you attack a city with a decrypted force and lose 500 units, they are gone for good. However, if 250 of those units were normal units, then you only lose 250 units.

    The decryption just gives all your units a "free life" and there is no point in wasting it.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:10 pm 
    User avatar
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Battle Crest Pins Supporter Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter This user is a Tool! This user was a Tool before it was cool Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:12 pm
    Posts: 565
    Location: Northern Virginia
    raphfrk wrote:
    Assuming the units are loyal, there is no point in killing them. Units are presumably worth their upkeep anyway, otherwise, there would be no point in popping them.

    Especially when Stanley's side is rolling in money from the gems brought up by the volcano and their wave of conquest.

    _________________
    Is this a real holy war, or just a bunch of deluded boopholes croaking each other?

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2009 1:46 pm 
    Offline
    Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 3:31 pm
    Posts: 28
    Fair enough, good points.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:57 pm 
    This user is a Tool! Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 1:22 am
    Posts: 8
    That being said, since there's no real chance of putting Parson into battle, and his upkeep is really, really high, it may be worth it in his case.

    Yes, I realize that the main conflict of the next book is likely to be Parson v. Wanda, and that won't work if he's her mindslave. I also realize there's no guarantee Parson can be decrypted.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:10 pm 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 12:23 pm
    Posts: 65
    Location: San Diego, California
    And like raphfrk said, Stanley probably wouldn't want his entire army to be purely loyal to Wanda and not him.

    _________________
    The first step to being right all of the time is to admit that you're wrong most of the time.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:12 am 
    Offline
    Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:27 pm
    Posts: 84
    Silophant wrote:
    That being said, since there's no real chance of putting Parson into battle, and his upkeep is really, really high, it may be worth it in his case.

    Yes, I realize that the main conflict of the next book is likely to be Parson v. Wanda, and that won't work if he's her mindslave. I also realize there's no guarantee Parson can be decrypted.

    he isn't THAT expensive. 1000 a day... the spell to get him was several hundreds times that...

    And they supposedly got so many gems from the mountain, as to be, possibly the richest side in the world. So decrypting parson, or casters, or even infantry just to avoid paying the bills makes no sense... now if they were running out of money, then instead of losing units due to lack of funds, just kill and decrypt them all. And send living troops in first, so that those who die can be decrypted... saving the decrypted as a reserve since they cannot be redecrypted.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:47 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 5:34 pm
    Posts: 378
    taltamir wrote:
    Silophant wrote:
    That being said, since there's no real chance of putting Parson into battle, and his upkeep is really, really high, it may be worth it in his case.

    Yes, I realize that the main conflict of the next book is likely to be Parson v. Wanda, and that won't work if he's her mindslave. I also realize there's no guarantee Parson can be decrypted.

    he isn't THAT expensive. 1000 a day... the spell to get him was several hundreds times that...

    And they supposedly got so many gems from the mountain, as to be, possibly the richest side in the world. So decrypting parson, or casters, or even infantry just to avoid paying the bills makes no sense... now if they were running out of money, then instead of losing units due to lack of funds, just kill and decrypt them all. And send living troops in first, so that those who die can be decrypted... saving the decrypted as a reserve since they cannot be redecrypted.


    Great analysis. Good thing GK is led by a such a thoughtful and erudite... Nevermind.

    Stanley would so arange for Parson to die on the front lines to save a 1,000 schmuckers a turn. Plus, Parson's penchant for insulting him would probably go away and I don't think he trusts Parson an iota more than Wanda and probably a good deal less. There is no evidence that Wanda has ever ignored an order from Stanley.

    _________________
    "Act, and God will Act." - Joan of Arc

    "Those who plot the destruction of others often perish in the attempt." - Thomas Moore

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:03 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 4:17 am
    Posts: 666
    WLM: mooseodeath@hotmail.com
    Location: Brisbane, Australia
    i'm not sure what the usual is for games of the type. but the only game even remotely like erfworld i've played was balck and white 2.

    to promote a citizen to a soldier, i think it cost 10 times as much food for that unit.

    so to upgrade parson from garrison to even test if he has the move to leave the city.. could cost 10,000 schmuckers for the turn. it may be built into his spell that he can't be sent out to war.

    under that circumstance parson would need most of GK forces to be routted and be heading for another BFGK storyline. also why would stanley risk the perfect warlord being loyal to wanda's arkentool? he's not QUITE that stupid

    _________________
    http://moosetech.blogspot.com/ my video game art. in easy to read blog form. swing on by. laugh at my spelling.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
    Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     
    Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

    Board index » Erfworld Things » Everything Else Erfworld


    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests

     
     

     
    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot post attachments in this forum

    Search for:
    Jump to: