Forum    Members    Search    FAQ

Board index » Erfworld Things » Everything Else Erfworld




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
 
Author Message
 Post subject: "The Parson Threshold"
 Post Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 4:04 am 
This user is a Tool!
Offline
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:10 pm
Posts: 389
Bored on the Internet as I tend to be, I have developed an idea I call, unsurprisingly, "The Parson Threshold." It refers to the moment when a character in a fictional work has a moment of sudden realization that frees him from a self-imposed mental block, when a person first starts to realize that other solutions besides the obvious one are present. (Parson crossed this threshold before the comic started, lateral thinker that he is. Of course, nobody's perfect...)

Jack crossed the Threshold here, for the first time on-panel at least. It happens in Panels 10-11 (and presumably off-panel in 12, depending on how that chronology works). Jack applies what he's learned from Parson to find an utterly unconventional yet utterly simple solution to their current predicament. Since this paradigmatic progression is sort of the whole plot of Erfworld, Jack's pretty much the only one who's broken out of his box. (Not that he had much of a box to begin with.) Tramennis is clever enough to learn and adapt in this fashion, should he encounter Parson at a time when they are not trying to murder each other, but that's gonna take some doing. Assuming Tramennis even lives through this battle, which I do hope he does.

Another example from another popular fantasy webcomic that everyone here has almost certainly heard of: Order of the Stick. Vaarsuvius has hir* epiphany here right in Panel 8. V has completed that manner of frustrated rant many times throughout hir career, so to see hir suddenly catch on is quite gratifying. Between V's Awesomeness By Analysis to deduce the nature of the gap in hir rival's defenses to hir finally using hir awesome capacity for monologuing offensively rather than just incidentally, V has taken another step closer to approaching the buzzing, humming, unconstrained cognition that powers the good Lord Hamster.


* When is the English language going to freaking decide on a standardized polite gender-neutral (or gender-ambiguous) third-person pronoun? "It" can't really refer to people and "his/her" just wearies me.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:17 am 
    User avatar
    Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter This user is a Tool! Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary
    Offline
    Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 10:36 pm
    Posts: 1909
    You could also say Jack crossed the threshold when he thought up the 'decrypt them before they hit the ground' plan. That wasn't exactly straightforward.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:06 pm 
    User avatar
    Year of the Dwagon Supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 5:24 am
    Posts: 3447
    GaryThunder wrote:
    * When is the English language going to freaking decide on a standardized polite gender-neutral (or gender-ambiguous) third-person pronoun? "It" can't really refer to people and "his/her" just wearies me.


    It's moving in that direction and if there hadn't been for bugbears like Strunk and White, it would have gotten there already.

    Linked article is one of several on the topic of "singular they" (appearances, reactions to, instances where it's misused ... yes, descriptivist linguists do care for understandable,uhm,ness) from the people at Language Log.

    _________________
    The whole point of this is lost if you keep it a secret.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:13 pm 
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit Erfworld Bicycle® Playing Cards supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:42 pm
    Posts: 96
    BLANDCorporatio wrote:
    Linked article is one of several on the topic of "singular they" (appearances, reactions to, instances where it's misused ... yes, descriptivist linguists do care for understandable,uhm,ness) from the people at Language Log.


    I'm a supporter of the singular they as regards an unidentified generic person. But it immediately feels awkward when referring to a single named person as 'they' or 'them' as then 'they' in the sentence carries other connotations. So I don't think it's quite sufficient here.

    Even more off topic:
    Spoiler: show
    Example:

    "Oh, is that Alex over there? What's going on with them, I haven't seen them in a while?"
    "I don't know, they've been gone for almost a month and all of a sudden they show up today?"

    Here 'they' feels like I'm talking about Alex and someone else by association. Of course I also use the contraction for 'they have' here when 3rd person singular usually uses has, though "they's been gone" has it's own problems.

    Whereas in:

    "I'm not going to spend another minute waiting for anyone, no matter how important they are!"

    The 'they' feels just fine.
    Here 'anyone' is singular, but because it involves a generic unidentified person it also has the potential to refer to multiple people

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
    Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     
    Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

    Board index » Erfworld Things » Everything Else Erfworld


    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests

     
     

     
    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot post attachments in this forum

    Search for:
    Jump to: