Forum    Members    Search    FAQ

Board index » Erfworld Things » Everything Else Erfworld




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Overlord vs. Ruler
 Post Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 10:30 pm 
User avatar
Offline
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:59 pm
Posts: 1075
Location: K-W, Ontario, Canada
Rob Balder just wrote this on the Wiki:
Quote:
A gem is a physical object which can be converted directly to Shmuckers by a caster, warlord or ruler. Shmuckers cannot be made into gems, except by a Moneymancer.


Well, that's cool. New info for us. There's no third party buying gems, it just poofs from gem to shmuckers. But...

Note that Rob used the term Ruler. He found the term did not have a page on the Wiki, instead finding us using "Overlord".

Here's why, I think... Klog 5. "Only one overlord per side. Overlord sets production for all cities."

Later, we have Klog 10. Gone is the term Overlord, now it's Ruler. "Some may disobey if the believe the order goes against higher orders or the Ruler's interests."

So, this is what I think we were supposed to believe. Parson first met Stanle, an Overlord. He lacked knowledge of Royals, so had no reason to know that Overlord wasn't the term for all Side leaders. No, he later finds out Overlords are non-Royal side leaders, and Royalists call themselves Kings (or Tsar, or Don, or something else). So he now uses the term Ruler to refer to a Side's leadership, regardless of Royalty. We, however, don't get in on that insight, and so it looks like Ruler and Overlord are interchangeable.

So, hopefully Rob will clarify. If Ruler is correct, I'll fix the Wiki, if no one beats me to it.

_________________
http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/TBFGK_1 Here you can find all comic pages written as text for convenient quoting.

http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/Erfworld_Mechanics The starting page for accessing all known Erfworld "rules".

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 12:36 am 
    User avatar
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Year of the Dwagon Supporter This user was a Tool before it was cool
    Offline
    Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 8:37 am
    Posts: 47
    I feel that Overlord is the official term for a guy who is the sole leader/ruler of his capital side. (If he or she is Royal, then King or Queen can be used.)
    I guess Ruler is just a synonym.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 1:07 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 12:24 pm
    Posts: 313
    I believe the titles were as follows if I remember correctly.

    King/overlord (or other befitting title signifying the overall leader of the faction (Stanley - overlord, Saline - King)
    Chief Warlord (Parson/ansom/others who 'can' do the work if the overall ruler is not available)
    Overall those are the top two positions.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 1:59 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 11:58 pm
    Posts: 67
    Location: SEA, WA, USA
    To me, that begs the question of why you'd convert schmuckers to gems. What purpose do they serve?

    _________________
    Avatar courtesy of Dr. Bath of GitP!

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 2:44 am 
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Battle Crest Pins Supporter Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter Year of the Dwagon Supporter This user is a Tool! Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit Erfworld Bicycle® Playing Cards supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 10:37 am
    Posts: 107
    Encumbrance. You can probably carry and move a highly valuable gem more easily than its equivalent in schmuckers. If Stanley had a moneymancer then maybe he could have escaped with Goblin Knob's treasury, and Wanda wouldn't have been able to convince him to buy the Parson spell.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 7:30 am 
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 10:38 am
    Posts: 830
    In the talk page. Balder has confirmed that Ruler is the official term

    Quote:
    This is correct. All Overlords are Rulers. All Kings are Rulers. Ruler is the generic term for the principle leader of a side.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 7:35 am 
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 10:38 am
    Posts: 830
    Frogpop wrote:
    Encumbrance. You can probably carry and move a highly valuable gem more easily than its equivalent in schmuckers.


    Right, but it is not an encumbrance limit, it is a purse limit. From the purse article, a unit can only carry 1000*level schmuckers.

    Even if Stanley is level 10 (unlikely), then he could only take 10,000 schmuckers with him.

    As you say, with a moneymancer, he could have converted it to gems. However, they might be covered by an encumbrance limit (say your inventory has only 100 slots).

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 10:09 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:59 pm
    Posts: 1075
    Location: K-W, Ontario, Canada
    Okay, Wiki is fixed. Ruler and Overlord have separate definitions.

    On a side note... what makes you think Stanley isn't Level 10 or even much higher? He's described as winning battles for Saline using his dwagons and Arkenhammer, which puts him in the thick of the fighting, both gaining XP for killing things and winning battles as Warlord/Chief Warlord. Stanley may not be a good strategist, but he hits really, really hard. He's probably the highest level character in play right now, and probably the best one-on-one combatant.

    _________________
    http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/TBFGK_1 Here you can find all comic pages written as text for convenient quoting.

    http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/Erfworld_Mechanics The starting page for accessing all known Erfworld "rules".

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 11:02 am 
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 10:38 am
    Posts: 830
    Kreistor wrote:
    On a side note... what makes you think Stanley isn't Level 10 or even much higher?


    Yeah, true. Ansom is level 10, so Stanley could easily be that high.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 11:09 am 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 12:24 pm
    Posts: 313
    He easily seemed to smack transylvitos chief warlord aside in one swing. XD

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 11:34 am 
    User avatar
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter This user is a Tool! This user was a Tool before it was cool Pin-up Calendar and New Art Team Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit Erfworld Bicycle® Playing Cards supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 11:32 am
    Posts: 67
    I strongly suspect that Stanley is stone hard in combat. He used to win lots of battles for poor old Saline IV. Stanley's real problem, I feel, is that he is a victim of the Peter Principle, which states that 'in a hierarchy every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence.' He was likely a quite good Piker, an effective Warlord and a very decent Chief Warlord as long as he had someone to give him orders that made sense -- but totally out of his depth once he ascended to the very top. This is unfortunately not uncommon, especially not in military hierarchies.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 1:05 pm 
    User avatar
    Year of the Dwagon Supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 10:04 pm
    Posts: 498
    Kreistor wrote:
    Okay, Wiki is fixed. Ruler and Overlord have separate definitions.

    On a side note... what makes you think Stanley isn't Level 10 or even much higher? He's described as winning battles for Saline using his dwagons and Arkenhammer, which puts him in the thick of the fighting, both gaining XP for killing things and winning battles as Warlord/Chief Warlord. Stanley may not be a good strategist, but he hits really, really hard. He's probably the highest level character in play right now, and probably the best one-on-one combatant.



    Well, don't forget that Stanley was riding a dragon at the time, with an Akentool, and was dance fighting too. I'm sure Stanley is around level 10. But Rob has also said the leveling curve is like a logarithmic one, and levels like 10 and 11 are very difficult to achieve. Level 20 is "unheard of" I think he said. So Stanley could be around level 10 but it's unlikely he's much higher. I'm sure Jetstone was sending their best troops to get Stanley. So I'd guess that level 10 is close to the maximum practical level.

    My 2 schmukers.

    _________________
    "Do it?" Dan, I'm not a Republic serial villain. Do you seriously think I'd explain my master-stroke if there remained the slightest chance of you affecting its outcome?

    I did it thirty-five minutes ago.

    Avatar hoarked from PS238.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 2:17 pm 
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 10:38 am
    Posts: 830
    gameboy1234 wrote:
    But Rob has also said the leveling curve is like a logarithmic one, and levels like 10 and 11 are very difficult to achieve.


    Assuming that the base is only 1.5 (so 50% more needed for go from level 2 to 3 as to go from 1 to 2), then the exp required to go from 9 to 10 would be 25 times larger than going from 1 to 2.

    Total exp required would be something like

    Level: Total exp required
    1: 0
    2: 100 (baseline)
    3: 250
    4: 475
    5: 813
    6: 1319
    7: 2078
    8: 3217
    9: 4926
    10: 7489
    11: 11333
    12: 17100
    13: 25749
    14: 38724
    15: 58186
    16: 87379
    17: 131168
    18: 196852
    19: 295378
    20: 443168

    Thus someone on level 10 would need to earn 9.2 times more exp than someone on level 5.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 2:26 pm 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 12:24 pm
    Posts: 313
    Didnt nobles have a leveling advantage as well making it easier for them to level up?

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 2:28 pm 
    E is for Erfworld Supporter Here for the 10th Anniversary Has collected at least one unit
    Offline
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 10:38 am
    Posts: 830
    Lothmar wrote:
    Didnt nobles have a leveling advantage as well making it easier for them to level up?


    Actually, if the exp growth factor is different for nobles, then it would make a massive difference at higher levels. OTOH, it might just be that they level twice as quickly.

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 6:01 pm 
    Print Book 2 & Draw Book 3 Supporter Year of the Dwagon Supporter
    Offline
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 2:54 am
    Posts: 75
    Website: http://www.swchome.com
    Location: Washington State
    Lothmar wrote:
    Didnt nobles have a leveling advantage as well making it easier for them to level up?

    yes, it was mentioned in one of the klogs that royal units level faster

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
     Post subject: Re: Overlord vs. Ruler
     Post Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 9:37 pm 
    User avatar
    Offline
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:59 pm
    Posts: 1075
    Location: K-W, Ontario, Canada
    gameboy1234 wrote:
    Well, don't forget that Stanley was riding a dragon at the time, with an Akentool, and was dance fighting too. I'm sure Stanley is around level 10. But Rob has also said the leveling curve is like a logarithmic one, and levels like 10 and 11 are very difficult to achieve. Level 20 is "unheard of" I think he said. So Stanley could be around level 10 but it's unlikely he's much higher. I'm sure Jetstone was sending their best troops to get Stanley. So I'd guess that level 10 is close to the maximum practical level.


    He isn't shown Dance-fighting in Faq in 160, but that's irrelevant. If he can, it's part of himself and it makes him a better combatant.

    The dwagons, well, how often are we going to see a one-on-one between two individuals in this place? Stanley and his dwagons destroyed Faq wholesale. In a single Turn. But dwagons are hardly overpowering: Jillian kills unwounded dwagons, as well as wounded ones. But if winning battles confers XP on Stanley as Warlord (suggested by his comments to Parson about Warlords not getting XP if they retreat), then those dwagons are going to carry him to higher level. And that's what I was asking about... why think he's lower level? Dwagons win, so he gets XP. Arknehammer massacres a stack of enemies, he gets XP for killing and XP for winning the battle. The Arkenhammer and dwagons are a means for him to gain XP where others would lose: that should make him higher level, regardless of not being Royal with a different XP curve.

    _________________
    http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/TBFGK_1 Here you can find all comic pages written as text for convenient quoting.

    http://www.erfworld.com/wiki/index.php/Erfworld_Mechanics The starting page for accessing all known Erfworld "rules".

  • Tip this post

    Make Anonymous
  • Top 
       
    Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
     
    Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

    Board index » Erfworld Things » Everything Else Erfworld


    Who is online

    Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

     
     

     
    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot post attachments in this forum

    Search for:
    Jump to: